1. Initial Events
In plant disasters, the leakage of hazardous materials is often the initial event, so we begin our investigation by considering the leakage as the initial event. If the cause of the leakage is operational error or equipment failure, we trace back further and consider the operational error or failure as the initial event. On the other hand, in cases such as cable fires in electrical rooms that do not involve hazardous materials, or building fires caused by lightning strikes, the fire itself is considered the initial event.
Choosing the right initial approach is crucial, requiring deep knowledge and experience with the plant. Based on our many years of experience and proven track record, we propose the optimal solution.
2. Assessment of the frequency of each disaster
The specific procedure for assessing the frequency of occurrence is as follows:
Flowchart for evaluating incidence frequency
1. Calculation of occurrence frequency
For each initial event, an event tree is developed, and the probability of errors, malfunctions, etc., is applied to each event to determine the frequency (times/year) in which disasters occur.
This work requires plant documentation such as layout diagrams, P&ID flow diagrams, and equipment data. Furthermore, probabilities of errors and failures will be assessed using disaster prevention assessment guidelines for petrochemical complexes, nuclear-related data, or publicly available data from the US and EU.
2. Calculation of relative priority (if necessary)
If you want to determine relative priority, you can also evaluate it using a relative disaster level index, which is based on the highest frequency of disaster occurrence among each initial event.
3. Assessment of the impact of each disaster
The specific steps for impact assessment are as follows:
Impact Assessment Process
1. Selection of evaluation indicators
Indicators for evaluating the impact include various losses such as human casualties caused by the disaster, construction costs for rebuilding facilities, losses due to business closures, and losses due to reputational damage. In some cases, combinations of these may also need to be considered. The priority given to each indicator will be determined in consultation with the customer, based on their safety policies and philosophy.
2. Setting the impact level classification
We determine the degree of impact from a disaster by setting impact categories for each indicator. When setting the categories, we refer to disaster prevention assessment guidelines for petrochemical complexes, nuclear-related data, or data published in the United States and the EU.
3. Calculation of relative priority (if necessary)
We determine the degree of impact from a disaster by setting impact categories for each indicator. When setting the categories, we refer to disaster prevention assessment guidelines for petrochemical complexes, nuclear-related data, or data published in the United States and the EU.
4. Conduct disaster simulations (if necessary)
Furthermore, if it is necessary to estimate the physical extent of the impact caused by a disaster, we will conduct a disaster simulation. We will present the extent of the impact using our proprietary plant disaster simulation software.
For details on each simulation technique, please refer to the Plant Disaster Prevention Simulation documentation.
4. Plant disaster risk level assessment
The disaster risk level (R) associated with each initial event is calculated using the following formula, based on the disaster frequency (F) obtained from the frequency assessment and the impact (S) obtained from the impact assessment.
Disaster risk level calculation formula
R = F × S
The risk level is classified according to the disaster risk level (R), as shown in the example in the diagram below, and this classification is used as a basis for determining the urgency and necessity of countermeasures.